Others_message_on_the_net - Message

_________________________________________________________________________________________________



_________________________________________________________________________________________________



We do not believe justified the closure of websites, we understand that measures pressure and alleged harassment to organizations and freedom of information can not be criminalized, for the life you lead or lead particular individuals.

Here we find an alleged abuse of power of governments to address orchestrated by most large multinational media, with the excuse of protecting something.

Well, when the result is a complete rejection of society, where they are perceived in mass protests and outrage as mentioned above.

He could play many themes as examples.


We will go to the point.

A person belongs to a group, legal, but this specific group, beliefs or standards can not create a specific action that goes against their normatives.A blood transfusion, but it turns out you do not receive transfusion blood the person dies.

Groups who say they use condoms is to kill human beings, yet allow these orders to his faithful followers, while it is scientifically proven that condoms prevent infections and viruses.

Pacifist false color depending on their ideology or interests of his group, distanced himself from a universal goal, which is peace and common sense, but obviously the natural defense of the living.


Indicating collective and influenced politicians to say that two persons of the same sex can not love or have sex, until recently, in some countries, they are murdered because of sexual orientation, simply.

human beings dying of hunger or thirst, while the news broadcast on TV, when you eat with your family.
People who are starving, while large corporations and banks (the majority) do nothing to avoid this problem. Who offends?

Institutions say that justice is equal for all, while we see people imprisoned for stealing food crimes remain in prison (30 years) and bankers and politicians are acquitted or not prosecuted for their crimes.

People who need to fill in a box if you are black, Caucasian or Asian, etc., to order a simple loan of money, engage as many times different when some of these people have given their lives to defend those who make them laws and their families, etc. is not that a crime?


People who lose their jobs because of the return or exchange for shares in shareholders' tax havens doubtful, or simple mismanagement or abuse of people's money, speculation, etc.

And what does all this with file downloads?
Freedom of speech, rules of conduct, control, censorship, etc, etc,


Examples are drastic, but real as life itself. 
Finally, unfortunately, the person is no longer.
And governments allow these actions.
A woman is pregnant but her life is in danger, the woman dies that belongs to this group, and its rules prevent him from performing an abortion. Who violates the basic rule of life?
I buy an item, a book, a newspaper, a CD, the material is owned by me, if someone tells me that a crime to share with others.  
Who is the offender?

If I share the internet connection services, and there is a company that forces a government to ban such action  
Why I can not do?

If I have a car of my property,
I can not carry one to guest, or simply for me shared the vehicle.

If I am a student, and it turns out I have to do work for a company, a teacher, to a thesis, a collective, and the material I use to do the work is mine or I have given, because I can not use .


If the losses by the big multinationals are due to the reason for network sharing, it scares me to think about who governs us in the world, which unfortunately seem short of ideas or simply are not with the times.

ISD or SID:
Shared Internet download
could make an argument that I have been listening to this project years.
the user pays 1 € / $ per connection by way of ISD.(VAT included)
If the user does not want this additional service is not mandatory and browse voluntarily without the need to download supposedly protected material (called by some).
Who controls this price?
 companies Connection Service, and Group of Internet (to discuss). (Consensus, project approval).

Where possible apply this option?
In any country in the world can access copyrighted material.
How that money is distributed?
It will create the necessary mechanisms for providing services navigation boarding school associations, etc.. (SPC, to determine, approve, etc.) to verify the links hosted in public information access, google, yahoo, etc, etc .
Number of downloads made with specific reference to protected material mentioned (number of links, downloads a day, limiting downloads for proxies, other options) (A discussion, by consensus, to check, etc, etc, by said parties, organizations, entities ASSOCIATIONS Internet users, surveys, Foundations neutral, etc, etc).

Who is it for these amounts?
A multimedia companies affected by similar copyright, etc..




Clauses ¿?
Entities controlled by safe, never in tax havens.
(Other options-10%, 5% for social work, aid groups in the social, other proposals, etc, etc) (To be discussed by consensus between the parties, regulatory bodies mentioned above, associative of Users, etc, etc ).




We therefore believe that introducing an elephant in a store, not is the best option for resolving the problems.
It creates insecurity in society in general.
And criminalizing people for legitimate actions such as going shopping, going to the cinema or a drink.

If these companies were so bad hosting(host) supply on the internet, they were allowed to continue for years, rather that was not handled before, the answer is very simple, is that those who govern us are technologically backward, or at least they seem.


Why is not rated or aproved bill(law) yet believe the law is approved?
Very simple to look at measures to pressure Internet companies, and services blocked in certain countries.

What does this mean?
Well, are trampling the rights of citizens to the detriment of the large corporations of media power and its acolytes.



What excuse do you use? Be unpatriotic, nothing is further from the truth.

We spoke to many experts in internet and we all say the same thing, they want to control people.
Copyright is an excuse that people try to sneak past or for the controlled.

Imagine that require you to do certain things, or simply unable to access information online.
He imagines that he can pursue or put him in jail simply because they share a band or a movie.


The world would be boring if everyone thinks the same.
You have to listen to people and you can decide for himself what is best for your freedom.





My friends say ..:
The problem with this is that, for some, the defend the personal freedom and social justice, he is considered an attack on democracy.
And that is that those are who think that they are afraid of losing power illegitimate or false to dominate society.
People read, is documented,to see,
have been late, we are forward and, on simple, is that  bothers them a lot.

Before authors
  we are all citizens, do not forget.

We were wrong about one thing, we underestimated to the leeches,
we did not know that they were hypocrites.

[Free_World]